On 2/13/07, Rodney Dawes <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > > I did. But gnome-menus is not the specification. Because it is doing > something, doesn't make it correct.
But the fact that the very first implementation gets it wrong might give you a hint that the spec could do with some clarification... > Is Preferences->System another Fedora thing? Or does it only exist if > you have gnome-system-tools installed, or something? If the latter, the > items in gnome-system-tools obviously fall under the "system settings" > distinction, and thus are appropriately under the category which is > using the preferences-system icon. No. Actually, it is a novell thing, or at least a "new control-center shell" thing. It is the "System" category in the control-center shell. and has thus been justified by tons of usability testing... > > Well, it is not as if there was no Documentation category in the menu > > spec... > > There is no Documentation "Main Category" in the spec. It is an > "Additional Category" which must be accompanied by a Main Category. Not > that I have any idea why it's there in the first place. The description > is "help or documentation." I guess someone never learned to not use the > word they're defining, in the definition. Is it really so hard to understand that it may be useful to make documentation available via the menu ? Anyway, no need to discuss this point further, we can easily make up our own icon names. _______________________________________________ gnome-themes-list mailing list [email protected] http://mail.gnome.org/mailman/listinfo/gnome-themes-list
