IMHO Another task to do in 2.20 timeframe is clarify the emblem
question.
### The Issues ###
There are several issues here (not all fixable in g-i-t). The current
status is:
* g-i-t is shipping a lot of emblems: legacy emblems and INS[1]
emblems
* not all INS emblems are in g-i-t; not all sizes are available
* if I'm right, by now only Nautilus and F-Spot are using emblems
* Nautilus grabs emblems at wrong size
* Nautilus has bugs getting emblem names
* other...
Besides, with emerging xdg-user-dirs spec/utils/approac, could be
interesting provide emblems (or another mechanism[2]) to identify
special dirs.
### The Emblems ###
INS emblems:
* emblem-default
* emblem-documents
* emblem-downloads
* emblem-favorite
* emblem-important
* emblem-mail
* emblem-photos
* emblem-readonly
* emblem-shared
* emblem-symbolic-link
* emblem-synchronized
* emblem-system
* emblem-unreadable
Legacy emblems:
* emblem-art
* emblem-camera
* emblem-certified
* emblem-cool
* emblem-cvs-*
* emblem-danger
* emblem-desktop
* emblem-distinguished
* emblem-draft
* emblem-handshake
* emblem-marketing
* emblem-money
* emblem-multimedia
* emblem-noread --> INS:emblem-unreadable
* emblem-note
* emblem-nowrite --> INS:emblem-readonly
* emblem-ohno
* emblem-OK
* emblem-people
* emblem-personal
* emblem-pictures
* emblem-plan
* emblem-presentation
* emblem-sales
* emblem-sound
* emblem-trash
### The Ideas ###
So, any idea? Well, except burn all and start from zero...
[1] INS := Icon Naming Spec
[2] for example use named icons, not emblems: folder-movies,
folder-documents, folder-projects...
_______________________________________________
gnome-themes-list mailing list
[email protected]
http://mail.gnome.org/mailman/listinfo/gnome-themes-list
