> > I do not agree with this. Yes, the other engines are "second class" but > I really like the idea of having a variety of unique themes. I do think > that there is a place for eg. Crux and Industrial in the future and that > it is a good idea to also ship eg. a pink theme. > By having a diverse set of themes most people will be able to find one > that works well for them. At the same time we can show that a lot is > possible and hopefully people will enjoy browsing the themes.
the old engines have not been updated for years AFAIK so they are just slow and may have non-beautiful code. also the have less features then murrine or clearlooks which can look totally different by changing some values. i dont think we will need eg. crux and industrial, if you something special use pixmaps. > > If there would be a really simple theme modifying tool, [...] > gnome-color-chooser is a step in this direction. well this app is everything else than easy to use. i think about some basic options integrated into the apearance dialog where the color options are. > I think that as a first step would should simply add support to ship > colour schemes with themes. This would enable us to easily ship a dark > theme for GNOME. this would be really nice. i've seen screenshots of that months or maybe a year ago... > In the long run resolution independence and support for a scaling factor > would be what I want instead, but that requires changes in GTK+ that may > only be ready for GTK+ 3.0. that would be perfect!
_______________________________________________ gnome-themes-list mailing list [email protected] http://mail.gnome.org/mailman/listinfo/gnome-themes-list
