On Mon, 2005-11-21 at 16:43 +0100, Matthias Kaeppler wrote:
> Murray Cumming wrote:
> >>Okay, I was just somewhat confused because the C++ bindings supply a
> >>function called remove() (for synchronous deletion); it's probably just
> >>an overloaded wrapper for these two funtions (with a slightly more
> >>intuitive name).
> >
> >
> > No, that seems to be a wrapper for gnome_vfs_xfer_delete_list().
>
> Yes, you're right. So I have a couple of options on how to remove a
> file. Are there any guidelines/practices when to use what?
>
> AFAICT, if I want to remove files without blocking the rest of the
> application, I use the transfer() functions with the respective
> removal-options (as Alexander pointed out), and otherwise remove().
>
> Is that correct?
gnome_vfs_xfer_delete_list() is nicer than gnome_vfs_xfer_uri_list +
GNOME_VFS_XFER_DELETE_ITEMS if you just want to remove things. It'll end
up calling the same code as the normal _xfer call, but with less
arguments.
=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=
Alexander Larsson Red Hat, Inc
[EMAIL PROTECTED] [EMAIL PROTECTED]
He's an ungodly Republican filmmaker trapped in a world he never made. She's a
plucky hypochondriac former first lady living homeless in New York's sewers.
They fight crime!
_______________________________________________
gnome-vfs-list mailing list
[email protected]
http://mail.gnome.org/mailman/listinfo/gnome-vfs-list
