On Wed, 2006-01-11 at 12:26 -0600, Federico Mena Quintero wrote:
> On Wed, 2006-01-11 at 12:52 +0100, Alexander Larsson wrote:
>
> > This is really cool. I think someone who knows Samba and can do whatever
> > changes are required in libsmb can make the smb backend much more solid.
>
> Do you have any idea of what may be causing the problems? Is it
> gnome-vfs's fault, or libsmb's?
I'm not even exactly sure what the problems are, except from "it feels
flaky".
> [People seldom complain, if at all, of libsmb inside kioslave - maybe we
> are doing something wrong... I need to take a look at kio as well.]
gnome-vfs is threaded and in-memory (although in the vfs daemon these
days). kioslaves fork a new process for each request. This helps with
stability I guess.
=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=
Alexander Larsson Red Hat, Inc
[EMAIL PROTECTED] [EMAIL PROTECTED]
He's an all-American Amish paranormal investigator trapped in a world he never
made. She's a wealthy wisecracking traffic cop from the wrong side of the
tracks. They fight crime!
_______________________________________________
gnome-vfs-list mailing list
[email protected]
http://mail.gnome.org/mailman/listinfo/gnome-vfs-list
