On Mon, 2006-05-01 at 20:18 +0200, Sjoerd Simons wrote:
> Hi,
>
> If hal is enabled, but the hal mount command is not used (because there is
> no
> hal-udi avail) gnome-vfs currently falls back to just the MOUNT_COMMAND.
> While it should fallback to the same behaviour when no hal mount command is
> specified.
>
> Attached patch fixes this by removing the extra fallback code that is
> enabled when HAL_MOUNT is defined. So the fallback becomes exactly the
> same
> as when HAL_MOUNT isn't defined.
I think the idea was to never use pmount when gnome-vfs is built with
hal-mount support. Why would you want both?
=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=
Alexander Larsson Red Hat, Inc
[EMAIL PROTECTED] [EMAIL PROTECTED]
He's an immortal Catholic grifter with a mysterious suitcase handcuffed to his
arm. She's a plucky psychic bounty hunter with a song in her heart and a
spring in her step. They fight crime!
_______________________________________________
gnome-vfs-list mailing list
[email protected]
http://mail.gnome.org/mailman/listinfo/gnome-vfs-list
