Hello there! I agree that such a thing would not belong into gvfs. Not that I wanted to suggest that. ^^ I was not aware of mathusalem, but after looking through your (?) blog at apinc.org, I seems to be exactly what I had in mind. How hard, do you think, will it be to extend mathusalem with gvfs-capabilities? I'll have to take a look at the repo... :D
So long, raphael Steve Frécinaux wrote: > On Thu, 2007-02-15 at 19:18 +0100, Raphael Bosshard wrote: > >> No more seperate dialog windows for Epiphany, GFTP, Nautilus and so on. >> Everything available in one applet... > > Actually that's what was intended with mathusalem, that unfortunately > hasn't seen much news since SoC because I've been rather busy. But IMHO > it's too high-level to belong directly to gvfs, and would be quite > limitative. KDE for instance is moving from their KIO-UIServer (that did > that, but with one dialog for each job) to a more generic KUIServer). > > _______________________________________________ gnome-vfs-list mailing list [email protected] http://mail.gnome.org/mailman/listinfo/gnome-vfs-list
