John (J5) Palmieri wrote: Thanks John, and A.Walton!
I got concerned because it appeared under libdaemon_la_SOURCES but as it turns up these is only used in the various gvfs-* commands after nm the binaries. Both your answers also helped me to understand quite a bit on dual licensing :) First time I see this in textual forms. Thanks, -Ghee > gio is lgpl because it is part of gtk+. It is my understanding that > gvfs uses D-Bus and not gio so it it compatible because of that. > > dbus-main is GPL/AFL dual licensed (always look at the COPYING file for > a full description of the license). What dual licensing says is you can > use the file under either license but under copyright law you may not > modify the notice so if you use it under the AFL others can still use it > under the GPL. You can however link any AFL compatible license and the > GPL will not apply to the external source. > > We have been trying to re-license under MIT Permissive license to make > it easier for some licensing corner cases but hit a roadblock so that > may or may not happen. If your apps is not compatible with the GPL or > AFL (such as GPL + exception licenses) you can add an AFL exception to > your licenses (provided you have the rights) and use D-Bus under the AFL > license. > > _______________________________________________ gnome-vfs-list mailing list gnome-vfs-list@gnome.org http://mail.gnome.org/mailman/listinfo/gnome-vfs-list
