Just a summary. Is this the idea ?
I'm talking not only for d.g.o since Thomas has made a good point on g.o navigation issues. -----------------------------
BOX ---- Adv: - More space - Easier to integrate - Easy handling and coding
Disadv: - Only up to second level (eg. if CVS and Bugilla goes there, no room in the sub sites for boxed navigation, unless it goes horizontal)
TABBED ------- Adv: - More depth - Could bridge the "tools" and give consistent navigation - Easy to add in the subs - Easy to keep 1st to 2nd level connection
Disadv: - More difficult to code - Need work in variable width sites - Difficult to fit in gnome's current top since logo defines basic navigation.
BOTH ---- - Clean basic "g.o" navigation (Main sites, subs) - Provide a consistent look for Navigation - Both should hold the primary to second level connection
------------------------------
Fotis
Claus Schwarm wrote:
On Sat, 12 Mar 2005 01:12:00 +1100 Jeff Waugh <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
Sure it doesn't now, because it's a totally new element. :-) But this will make the developer sites seem like a coherent toolkit - an attractive idea.
Just to make sure we're talking about the same thing: You mean a graphical representation of tabs just like kde-apps.org, or the tabs on plone-powered sites like ubuntu?
I admit, I have problems understanding why this would make the impression of a coherent toolkit - you click on one of the tools, and the site design changes, the previous navigation box vanishes, etc.
Well, if other's like the idea...
Cheers, Claus
_______________________________________________
gnome-web-list mailing list
[email protected]
http://mail.gnome.org/mailman/listinfo/gnome-web-list
_______________________________________________ gnome-web-list mailing list [email protected] http://mail.gnome.org/mailman/listinfo/gnome-web-list
