On 8/25/05, Joseph S. Huang <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > What license is the content in the l.g.o wiki under? It should be > decided on and clarified ASAP.
Agreed that this would be nice. CC was toying for a while with a wiki-license which would have been appropriate and nice to use, but they seem to have given up on that and are falling back to cc-by-sa for that use case. What license is Debian recommending for docs these days anyway? Seems like that might be a good fallback. > Also, could anonymous editing be enabled for the > http://live.gnome.org/Epiphany/Suggestions page? I assume 'no'; that leads to wikispam. Luis _______________________________________________ gnome-web-list mailing list [email protected] http://mail.gnome.org/mailman/listinfo/gnome-web-list
