Hi, On 2/23/07, Thilo Pfennig <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > Hi, > I have started to work out some plan for the projects > (http://live.gnome.org/GnomeWeb/ProjectsPages) as this was > not started yet.
Cool. Take in account though all we discussed last year, which was a lot. The latest status was this diagram: http://desdeamericaconamor.org/blog/node/286 VERY IMPORTANT: in your email there is an apparent confusion between GNOME Products and Projects. They are different things, completely. - Products: cute and brief pages summarizing the greatness and features of SOFTWARE. A wgo section edited by marketing team with the collaboration of the developers behind each component/application (hopefully with some DOAP magic to optimize maintenance). Translated into wgo languages. - Projects: subsites where PEOPLE publish, document, collaborate and develop software products. under wgo/projects in the current structure, under projects.gnome.org during the 2.19 release cycle unless Jeff throw us an H-Bomb or we get stuck again. Each project is maintained by the teams, marketing doesn't do anything else than offer support (if they want it). There is a projects index to be improved. Translations are responsibility of each project (most are in English only) and we don't set any policy about which CMS to use etc. We can help to those willing to join the Plone platform, but we won push anybody. We have also - Teams: your are mixing them also in your email. GNOME teams are Accessibility, Marketing, Usability, Release, Documentation... Something completely different to Projects and to Products. > What I really would find important for the future would be more streamlined > project pages (software or not). Now I not sure if you are talking about the planned GNOME Products (which will be more streamlined) or project subsites (where there is no common policy, but offering a checklist with recommendations would help them). > I have read again the threads about gnomefiles.org but I think this really > does not help so much for our pages. The gnomefiles feeds will go in the GNOME Products page, this is planned and decided. > Another open question is if we should have a subdomain or not. My suggestion > would be for now that we NOW just try to move every page in /projects to the > new CMS. Yes to projects.g.o subdomain, No to move projects websites to the new CMS, unless a project comes by their own initiative looking for CMS help. > BTW: I think maybe it would be better if web structure and GNOME releases > would not be synced because my feeling is that expecially when a release is > coming people tend to have less time, If we would have followed the schedule now all the tough wirk would be done and we wiould be doing just betatest and related fixes. After 1,5 years following discussions and works about the wgo revamp I remember seeing just very few component maintainers, core developers. Also, the schedule proposed is about last deadlines, if someone wants to start earlier and finish earlier nobody is going to stop her. By now the problem is not about schedules, but about resources. At least this is how I see it. -- Quim Gil /// http://desdeamericaconamor.org _______________________________________________ gnome-web-list mailing list [email protected] http://mail.gnome.org/mailman/listinfo/gnome-web-list
