[Hello luis, we are discussing the license of Gnome wiki contents on, see the complete thread here [1], shaunm said that maybe you are interested]
El 4 de agosto de 2009 23:07, Paul Cutler<[email protected]> escribió: > I agree that CC-SA 3.0 is the best solution. The issue is in re-licensing > all of the existing content, which may not be possible due to having to get > each writer / editors permission. Anyone have any insight on how Wikipedia > did it? > Wikipedia moves from licensed under the GFDL to dual licensed under GFDL plus Creative Commons CC-BY-SA 3.0. You can see the process here [1] and a interesting lessig post here [2] Regards, [1] http://mail.gnome.org/archives/gnome-web-list/2009-August/msg00000.html [2] http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Wikipedia:Licensing_update [3] http://www.lessig.org/blog/2008/11/enormously_important_news_from.html -- Javier Jardón Cabezas _______________________________________________ gnome-web-list mailing list [email protected] http://mail.gnome.org/mailman/listinfo/gnome-web-list
