If you find a way to have that working without having to add a preference, then I'm all ears and ready to implement it.
Le lundi 20 mars 2006 à 12:23 +0100, Jan Schampera a écrit : > Hi. > > I want to raise discussion about a kind of secondary STUN server again, > because this morning, our STUN was down again. > > The behaviour of a STUN check detecting "blocked" and a STUN server not > responding is identical, so the registration to various SIP services > fail. > > I consider a "secondary STUN server", which is used when the "primary" > detected "blocked", to double-check the result as a user friendly > feature. > > Jan > -- _ Damien Sandras (o- //\ Ekiga Softphone: http://www.ekiga.org/ v_/_ FOSDEM 2006 : http://www.fosdem.org/ SIP Phone : sip:[EMAIL PROTECTED] sip:[EMAIL PROTECTED] _______________________________________________ Gnomemeeting-devel-list mailing list [email protected] http://mail.gnome.org/mailman/listinfo/gnomemeeting-devel-list
