yeah thanks, This means I can use all the features of Asterix for my OpenH323 based conferencing part. So as you mentioned it gives 2 channels. So this means that the programmer is having liberty to choose anyone. Also if I use Asterix or any other MediaG/W, then whether I need to change the source code for GnomeMeeting. I guess no.
I have also seen PSTNgw and also read the features of Yate. Well but it doesn't seem that Yate supports quicknet h/w. So I am left with PSTNgw/Asterix only. Isn't this so? But in the previous mails I found that PSTNgw is outdated now. Is it so? Actually confusion gets create when you saw a lot of such projects and some supports the features that you need and some don't. Please guide me in this context. Thanks, Ashutosh Sharma. On Mon, 2005-02-21 at 14:31, Damien Sandras wrote: > Le lundi 21 février 2005 à 10:56 +0530, Ashutosh Sharma a écrit : > > Hi Thanks, > > So that means Asterix does not support OpenH323. Actually my problem > > is to have the s/w packages in C++. > > > > It does support OpenH323, there are 2 channel drivers chan-oh323 and > chan-h323. _______________________________________________ GnomeMeeting-list mailing list [email protected] http://mail.gnome.org/mailman/listinfo/gnomemeeting-list
