a anything else would be inconvenient, unintelligent
On Sun, 2006-04-02 at 19:58 +0900, Kalin KOZHUHAROV wrote: > Damien Sandras wrote: > > Hello, > > > > I have had private e-mail exchanges with one person who thinks that > > having a common address book shared by GNOME applications like Ekiga and > > Evolution is a bad idea, and that it would be better to have a separate > > address book for Ekiga and a separate one for Evolution. > > > > He also thinks that I am not following the advice of my users and that I > > impose my own view of the project without taking into account external > > ideas. (The same rant about the new name was mentioned again). > > > > So I would like to do a quick poll on the mailing list. > > > > Please choose a), b) or c) : > > a) I think that it is better to have a common address book for all > > applications if possible > a) > > As long as it is configurable, a) is the choice. > > My usual objection on "desktop integrations" is that it needs too much > glue that translates to many configuration files (or GUIs - worse!) in > different subsystems. And not everybody has to run LDAP server and even > those who try to provide free LDAP service are swamped and down by the > many requests eventually ;-) > > > b) I think it is better that all applications have their own address > > book, I don't want my contacts to be shared between the different > > applications I am using > > c) I do not care. > > Kalin. > _______________________________________________ GnomeMeeting-list mailing list [email protected] http://mail.gnome.org/mailman/listinfo/gnomemeeting-list
