Hi, GNU Arch seems to have a number of archive formats.
tla and baz have one aegis has another likewise arx The two closest cousins (tla, baz) both understand the same format (tla format) however baz has some improvements which can help with both portability to other platforms (Windows in particular) as well as performing things like 'annotate'. Are these improvement likely to be incorporated into tla? I'm very reluctant to create archives in (for want of another name) 'baz format' -- I'd much rather use a format that multiple tools understood and can use. Right now that is 'tla format'; what is its future? [1] Thanks, Anand [1]: Will some of the modifications the aegis / ArX crew have done also be incorporated? Arx, from what I read, uses c--b,v for example. Which allows "null" branches. -- linux.conf.au 2005 - http://lca2005.linux.org.au/ - Birthplace of Tux April 18th to 23rd - http://lca2005.linux.org.au/ - LINUX Canberra, Australia - http://lca2005.linux.org.au/ - Get bitten! _______________________________________________ Gnu-arch-users mailing list [email protected] http://lists.gnu.org/mailman/listinfo/gnu-arch-users GNU arch home page: http://savannah.gnu.org/projects/gnu-arch/
