On Friday, March 25, 2005 6:19 PM, David Allouche wrote: >> Only the one problem I see now. For example next situation: >> 1) Developer merges changes from local to main archive; >> (and arch generate the new patch-log) >> 2) All another developers don't change this archive; >> 3) At night cron run job for automerge, and this patch-log >> (as a new changeset) will be merged and commited to >> local archive. >> 4) Local archive again has changes (last commited patch-log) >> and developer go to point 1) >> >> Is exist right method to handle this situation? >> Or may be I am use broken ARCH usage schema?
>You should make your automatic merge script smarter so it detects when >the changes applied by the merge are only patchlog additions, and not >commit such merges since they would be mere noise. Advice me please which command I can use for true detect this? Thanks in advance! --- WBR, Alexander Popkov. _______________________________________________ Gnu-arch-users mailing list [email protected] http://lists.gnu.org/mailman/listinfo/gnu-arch-users GNU arch home page: http://savannah.gnu.org/projects/gnu-arch/
