Bob Tanner wrote:
On Monday 11 April 2005 04:14 pm, John A Meinel wrote:
Are you building Tom's version? Or the cygwin specific one?
$ ~/bin/tla --version
tla [EMAIL PROTECTED]/dists--tla--1.3[configs/gnu/tla-devo.cfg] from
regexps.com
Copyright 2003 Tom Lord
This is free software; see the source for copying conditions.
There is NO warranty; not even for MERCHANTABILITY or FITNESS FOR A
PARTICULAR PURPOSE.
Report bugs to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
[EMAIL PROTECTED]/dists--tla--1.3[configs/gnu/tla-devo.cfg]
;; arch-tag: Tom Lord Tue Oct 5 16:14:10 2004 (devo/=RELEASE-ID)
Downloaded the above from off the mailing list.
That is the old version. You aren't running the one that you are
extracting into /usr/local/bin
$ /usr/local/bin/tla --version
developer-build
Copyright 2003, 2004, 2005 Free Software Foundation, Inc.
This is free software; see the source for copying conditions.
There is NO warranty; not even for MERCHANTABILITY or FITNESS FOR A
PARTICULAR PURPOSE.
Report problems to [email protected]
See: http://www.gnu.org/software/gnu-arch
I'll probably fix the "developer-build" string once we settle out any
problems.
I'm pretty happy with the 1.3.1d build. It was able to download my
complete repository of ~90 projects, some of them rather long.
So what you probably need to do is delete whatever tla files you have in
~/bin, extract the tla-dos-1.3.1d.tar.gz into /usr/local/bin, and then
remove whatever source directories and revision libraries you have.
Because the two versions are not working directory compatible. (They are
compatible through the archive, but the working directory format is
different).
I just realized that this may be older than current, as the g-a-u list
seems to have come alive. Feel free to ignore if you have already done this.
John
=:->
signature.asc
Description: OpenPGP digital signature
_______________________________________________
Gnu-arch-users mailing list
[email protected]
http://lists.gnu.org/mailman/listinfo/gnu-arch-users
GNU arch home page:
http://savannah.gnu.org/projects/gnu-arch/
