Matthieu Moy <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes: > Robert Widhopf-Fenk <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes: > >> I will keep the tree as it is in order to reproduce the bug, >> just tell me who I may help. > > Robert, J�r�me, Can you try with > [EMAIL PROTECTED]/bazaar--pristine-version--1.4--patch-1 > > (either baz get it or baz replay this patch to your version of bazaar) > > It provides a (temporary) fix, which works for me. > > It presets version and revision information for the pristine tree so > that the ++default-version isn't needed anymore. It's temporary in the > sense that it does not set the fields in the right place of the code, > but I'll try to get something better. Hopefully, this will be fixed > for the 1.4.
Thanks for working on this. Unfortunately, I have no more unmergable tree to test it. I'll test it as soon as I encounter the problem again. Cheers, -- J�r�me Marant _______________________________________________ Gnu-arch-users mailing list [email protected] http://lists.gnu.org/mailman/listinfo/gnu-arch-users GNU arch home page: http://savannah.gnu.org/projects/gnu-arch/
