Tom Lord wrote: > > Basically, the idea is that anyone can publish any commit they like by > specifying a name for the commit, the names of immediate ancestors, > and the contents of the tree --- the "snapshot" approach to revision > control. Yes, I'm reversing my opinion of that approach from negative > to favorable.
Can I ask why you've changed your mind? I haven't seen any reason why this approach would be superior to treating changesets as the basic unit of version control, or why it would be beneficial to layer arch on top of git (or are these two questions unrelated?). Thanks, -- Jason McCarty <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> _______________________________________________ Gnu-arch-users mailing list Gnu-arch-users@gnu.org http://lists.gnu.org/mailman/listinfo/gnu-arch-users GNU arch home page: http://savannah.gnu.org/projects/gnu-arch/
