On Wed, 2005-06-08 at 11:00 +0200, Matthieu Moy wrote: > Ulf Ochsenfahrt <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes: > > > 1. tla commit should make a revlib entry > > True,
Where is the bugtracker that I can put this in? At least three people have agreed that this would be a good idea (and noone opposed it), so it should not be forgotten! > > 3. tla should show a progress bar for patch up-/download > > bazaar has this kind of progress bar, but it shows a dot only for each > downloaded changeset, so, it won't solve your particular problem. Any plans to do it? > > 4. archive-mirror is buggy when I break it with ctrl-c > > > > When I archive-mirror and i break it with ctrl-c, I can't do > > archive-mirror afterwards, it always says: > > > > ** adding revision artwork--mainline--0.1--patch-1 > > arch-mirror: unable to acquire revision lock (internal error in > > archive-pfs.c(pfs_lock_revision)) > > revision: > > [EMAIL PROTECTED]/artwork--mainline--0.1--patch-1 > > Bazaar would have told you to use > > baz lock-revision -b > > Which is the right thing to do here. Since we don't have a dedicated > server, this kind of situation can anyway happen, that's life. > However, tla/baz could cleanly catch the Control-C signal and exit > cleanly. Stupid me. Anyway, a short text message would be a _good thing_. > > 5. there should be a command that does tree-lint AND changes > > This is > > baz status > > If you're an Emacs user, Xtla 1.1's M-x status reruns status > automatically when the tree becomes lint-clean. I'm not. > > If baz solves all these > > Not all, but at least, it solves the problem of "I reported this > problem 3 times and it seems all my emails went to /dev/null" most of > the time. There is this bug czar thing. I'm not convinced that works. A bugtracker would be nice ... if the tla devs looked into it every now and then. > > and I can get a binary package for all my > > machines (debian woody on one server > > Will be hard (but possible) to get something working on this one. I'm going to upgrade to sarge soon, so that's not that much of a problem. > > - going to upgrade soon, debian > > sarge on the other, debian testing > > No problem on those. > > > & windows > > Windows is still a problem with both baz and tla, but bazaar makes big > efforts to be more portable. tla on windows works for me (tm). I took the version that is advertised in the wiki. If I can import my local repository on windows into baz, that should suffice. > > on my work machine, debian > > unstable on my home machine), then I will consider to switch. I am not > > going to install python though or anything big for that matter. > > python is required for bazaar-ng, but baz is 100% in C. Fine with me then. ;) Cheers, -- Ulf
signature.asc
Description: This is a digitally signed message part
_______________________________________________ Gnu-arch-users mailing list [email protected] http://lists.gnu.org/mailman/listinfo/gnu-arch-users GNU arch home page: http://savannah.gnu.org/projects/gnu-arch/
