On 6/23/05, Robert Collins <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > The plan was to consolidate the reporting so that we had > RM install-sh => install > > to indicate a rename & modified. Much like your wiki page suggests ;0.
I don't know if that form is really much more useful than the old form; at first glance, it seems more complex for automatic processing. For human users it's probably a wash. Anyway, the format should be consistent between commands, shouldn't be _gratuitously_ different from the old format (even if it's determined that "unified entry" for each files is definitely better, the format could definitely be closer to the old format -- if nothing else, simply put the "R column" _after_ the "normal column"), and should be discussed as part of a common change for tla/baz/etc. -Miles -- Do not taunt Happy Fun Ball. _______________________________________________ Gnu-arch-users mailing list [email protected] http://lists.gnu.org/mailman/listinfo/gnu-arch-users GNU arch home page: http://savannah.gnu.org/projects/gnu-arch/
