David Allouche <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes: > Why not just call it "--regex"?
There is already a --patch-regexp, I think it's better to have a more explicit state. > I would prefer a full match, as that would be more consistent with the > syntax that could be used in arguments of comands that can take several > branch names or globs/regexps. That's what I did first, but actually, a full match is not very meaningfull: You don't want to use [ar]browse to display a single revision. -- Matthieu _______________________________________________ Gnu-arch-users mailing list [email protected] http://lists.gnu.org/mailman/listinfo/gnu-arch-users GNU arch home page: http://savannah.gnu.org/projects/gnu-arch/
