Mikhael Goikhman said: > On 01 Aug 2005 00:05:20 +0200, Matthieu Moy wrote: >> >> Otherwise, I'm putting my binary here > > Thanks, I will test it tomorrow. After playing for 15 minutes I see that > there are remaining issues that we duscussed: naming "regex" options,
I applied your proposal now. (not merged in upstream) > missing --categories and company, --categories and --branches are missing. Personnally, I think adding them to rbrowse would complexify the code (and the spec, since the current rbrowse never displays categories and branches individually, I don't know what the output of baz rbrowse --categories should be) a lot for very little benefit. > full match rather than prefix match. If you mean "full match of category, branch, or version", this means the spec will have to change again with the future namespace change. I strongly prefer opting for the flat namespace now, and not having to change anything later. If you mean "full match of the version", this means the string match will match only one version, which is rather useless for rbrowse. I'd like to have other users opinion on this point. > And a new issue: non-archive part of limit is ignored with --versions. Fixed. Thanks. -- Matthieu _______________________________________________ Gnu-arch-users mailing list [email protected] http://lists.gnu.org/mailman/listinfo/gnu-arch-users GNU arch home page: http://savannah.gnu.org/projects/gnu-arch/
