Marco Mililotti <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes: > Hi,
Hi, > I'm using tla version 1.3.2 under Mac OSX. You should have a look at http://bazaar.canonical.com/ too. > After discovering that "tla tag --seal" doesn't create a base-0 sealed > version (this is somewhat a known bug as I've been told), Not surprising actually: sealed revisions are version-X, and can't, by definition, be a base-0. > I started managing my projects using a "devel--x.y" line (where new > patches are added), and using a "release" branch that is built of > tags from "devel--x.y--patch-x". FYI, Another commonly used solution is to have a separate project, which contains one config file (input of build-config) for each release. > And, magically, "prj-rel/" and "prj-dev/" are not the same. From the > logs I can see "prj-rel" it's missing patch-2, at least. Normally, the tag should contain one more file, which is the added patch-log entry for the tag ({arch}/bla-bla/...). > PS: > I've removed (with a simple "/bin/rm -rf") the "prj--release--a.b" > version that has been created by tag -S, and repeated the process many > times, but with the same end result! The short version: NEVER EVER DO THAT. The longer version: http://wiki.gnuarch.org/Changing_20History Since tla maintains a local cache (revision libraries, pristine trees, ...), deleting and recreating a branch with the same name has catastrophic effects. Your problem probably comes from here. -- Matthieu _______________________________________________ Gnu-arch-users mailing list [email protected] http://lists.gnu.org/mailman/listinfo/gnu-arch-users GNU arch home page: http://savannah.gnu.org/projects/gnu-arch/
