On Thu, Sep 08, 2005 at 12:14:25PM +0100, Toby White wrote: > Otherwise I'll stick with old tla versions for the moment, and > start thinking about migrating elsewhere - does anyone have any > recommendations for modern VC systems with very small dependency > lists?
You probably want to be looking at git. The next version of arch would have been a git variation. It needs zlib, openssl, GNU diff, some bits from rcs, and also curl if you want http support. None of that should be a problem on a unix platform. I'm pretty sure that's where I'm headed next. git isn't as good as arch but it's 'close enough' and appears fixable for the rest. -- .''`. ** Debian GNU/Linux ** | Andrew Suffield : :' : http://www.debian.org/ | `. `' | `- -><- |
signature.asc
Description: Digital signature
_______________________________________________ Gnu-arch-users mailing list Gnu-arch-users@gnu.org http://lists.gnu.org/mailman/listinfo/gnu-arch-users GNU arch home page: http://savannah.gnu.org/projects/gnu-arch/
