I wrote: *Of course* I agree about the importance of software freedoms and will do my best to always chose GPL-compatible free software licenses but those points of agreement are insufficient, in my opinion, to also stand as a public interface to an official GNU project.
The phrase "GPL-compatible" is too weak. I will chose a GPL-compatible *copyleft* (i.e., similarly viral) license whenever I can, usually the GPL itself. I can *imagine* very obscure circumstances when I would do otherwise but I don't expect them to come to pass. -t _______________________________________________ Gnu-arch-users mailing list [email protected] http://lists.gnu.org/mailman/listinfo/gnu-arch-users GNU arch home page: http://savannah.gnu.org/projects/gnu-arch/
