On Wed, Oct 12, 2005 at 10:43:38PM +0100, Bruce Stephens wrote: > There seems to me to be enough interesting work in darcs, codeville, > monotone, and (maybe) mercurial. Maybe svk, too.
Exactly what I said. Gross duplication of work and yet not *one* of them is vaguely feature complete. No less than six different groups, and probably more, have implemented the same thing and done it differently badly every time. That indicates something is very broken here. > I think it's > reasonable to assume that subversion has won the centralised RC race, I see people saying this several times a week, for subversion, cvs, rcs, tar, webdav, MS source safe, cmvc, perforce, and probably some more that I've forgotten. -- .''`. ** Debian GNU/Linux ** | Andrew Suffield : :' : http://www.debian.org/ | `. `' | `- -><- |
signature.asc
Description: Digital signature
_______________________________________________ Gnu-arch-users mailing list Gnu-arch-users@gnu.org http://lists.gnu.org/mailman/listinfo/gnu-arch-users GNU arch home page: http://savannah.gnu.org/projects/gnu-arch/
