"Alfred M\. Szmidt" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes: > So if you define `learning to use a VCS' as `branch, commit, send > patch', I suspect the time is equal for both tla, darcs and CVS.
The steps to do that with tla are: 1) set up an archive. Understand why the name of your archive must contain a "@" < if you don't set up a revision library, then you get awfull performances > 2) tla tag. Learn the Arch namespace, understand why your branch name must contain a category, a branch, a version, ... 3) tla get 4) tla commit With, say, bzr, you do bzr branch http://host.com/path/to/project cd project <hack hack hack> bzr commit It's similar with darcs, except that you don't even have to mirror your archive, since "darcs send" will send it by email to the maintainer for you. Did you _really_ look at the alternatives before saying that GNU Arch was not more complex than the others? -- Matthieu _______________________________________________ Gnu-arch-users mailing list Gnu-arch-users@gnu.org http://lists.gnu.org/mailman/listinfo/gnu-arch-users GNU arch home page: http://savannah.gnu.org/projects/gnu-arch/
