If work were to continue on revc (and I really hope it does even though
I can't afford to fund it), I'd like to see it moved to an archive
format that:
1. does not rely on binary metadata formats
2. uses gzip instead of raw zlib compressionSince most files are pretty small, I highly doubt that any performance gains by using raw zlib or a binary metadata format would have a noticeable impact on performance. I (and I suspect many Arch users) really like the transparent and orthogonal aspects of Arch, and would like to see Arch 2.0 continue that tradition. -- Eric Wong
signature.asc
Description: Digital signature
_______________________________________________ Gnu-arch-users mailing list Gnu-arch-users@gnu.org http://lists.gnu.org/mailman/listinfo/gnu-arch-users GNU arch home page: http://savannah.gnu.org/projects/gnu-arch/
