On Tue, Nov 01, 2005 at 09:12:32PM -0800, Thomas Lord wrote: > > 'make clean && tla commit && make' > > > Can take a very long time (hours) for something like x.org or OOo. > > Isn't that something to beef to x.org and OOo about? How does their > first-year-student-fundamentals bogosity warp into a design requirement > for revision control? What are the relative potential labor costs, > here, of fixing their problems vs. implementing the work-around in > ancillary tools? And who's paying? > > Aren't we essentially creating a kind of abstract caste system here?
So, it seems to me that you're attempting to create a RCS for a perfect world rather than designing for the cases that exist out there today? Is that an accurate summation?
signature.asc
Description: Digital signature
_______________________________________________ Gnu-arch-users mailing list Gnu-arch-users@gnu.org http://lists.gnu.org/mailman/listinfo/gnu-arch-users GNU arch home page: http://savannah.gnu.org/projects/gnu-arch/
