[EMAIL PROTECTED] (Ludovic Courtès) writes: > Hi, > > "Derek Zhou" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes: > >> My short-term wish list of features already in baz that I'd like to see >> in tla too: >> * a/c--b--v in stead of the -A. make more sense this way. > > What do you mean?
many tla commands have a -A option, and you can do for example $ tla get -A [EMAIL PROTECTED] my--project whereas baz forces you to do $ baz get [EMAIL PROTECTED]/my--project >> * cacherev every 50 revisions and every tag even within the same >> archive. Disk is cheap > > While I agree this should be the default, I think it should not be > hard-wired. In particular, cachedrevs for all tags are a bad choice if you microbranch a lot. It does not only cost disk space, it also costs bandwidth: if you have a close ancestor in your revision library, it's cheaper to apply a few changesets to it than to get the cached revision. Bazaar has clever algorithms to chose which full tree revision to start with (a cachedrev, the initial import, or in your revision library), but that's relatively deep changes, I don't think this will ever be merged into tla. -- Matthieu _______________________________________________ Gnu-arch-users mailing list Gnu-arch-users@gnu.org http://lists.gnu.org/mailman/listinfo/gnu-arch-users GNU arch home page: http://savannah.gnu.org/projects/gnu-arch/
