Hi,
Stefan Monnier <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
> The ones I tried at first all used recency to decide what to delete.
In fact, `tla-prune-revlib' in `tla-tools' (by Miles Bader) is slightly
more sophisticated than this. It allows the combination of several
heuristics:
--min-age=NDAYS Do not prune revisions less than NDAYS days old
(default 10)
--keep-new-revs=NREVS Do not prune the newest NREVS revisions (default 2)
--keep-old-revs=NREVS Do not prune the oldest NREVS revisions (default 2)
BTW, such revlib pruning is _policy_. I think tla should remain
policy-neutral, as it has always been. If such a mechanism was to be
inserted into tla itself, it should not be made compulsory. Even
discussions about what the _default_ behavior should be are likely to
end up in endless trolls. Therefore, my guess is: by default, do
nothing. ;-)
Thanks,
Ludovic.
_______________________________________________
Gnu-arch-users mailing list
Gnu-arch-users@gnu.org
http://lists.gnu.org/mailman/listinfo/gnu-arch-users
GNU arch home page:
http://savannah.gnu.org/projects/gnu-arch/
