Derek Zhou wrote: > Andy Tai <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes: > > I am against the idea of using a database as a tla archive > backend. IMHO one major strength of tla is the dumb, append only file > server storage model so backup/restore is easy and I can tinker with the > archive if I have to. > This being said, it probably make sense to use sqlite to manage the > patch logs in a checked out tree. Those are highly structured data > currently stored as thousands of small files, yuck. > Derek >
Well, the baz format archives (with $archive/category--branch--version/
instead of $archive/cat/cat--branch/cat--branch--version) are much more
friendly to the windows filesystem.
The painful operations are revision libraries and working trees.
Especially the temporary checkouts, where you have
$rl/archivename/category/category--branch/category--branch/version/
,,temporary-new-revision/category--branch--version-patches/{arch}/
category/category--branch/category--branch--version/
patch-log/...
That is where I was running into problems.
John
=:->
signature.asc
Description: OpenPGP digital signature
_______________________________________________ Gnu-arch-users mailing list [email protected] http://lists.gnu.org/mailman/listinfo/gnu-arch-users GNU arch home page: http://savannah.gnu.org/projects/gnu-arch/
