Le Mardi 10 Janvier 2006 19:18, Thomas Lord a écrit : > Building a user space file system is a good idea for lots of > reasons. But how? > > Don't use an RDBMS, persistent hash table, or other database > middle-ware as back-end. Sure, their support for transactions helps > a little and they do offer portable APIs to native storage. > Unfortunately they also come with a lot of code and baggage for > functionality not really needed and the APIs they provide aren't a > particularly natural target language for implementing a POSIX-style > file system. >
I agree that implementing a filesystem on a RDBMS, is not an optimal solution, because RDBMS is designed to remove the notion of filesystem (file,directory etc ...), so implementing something on a system that was designed to remove file notion .... To store data structured with a POSIX style, the better is the native filesystem. RDBMS can do a very good job if we respect the RDBMS view of how data must be structured for using such system. My view is whatever approach is used to store data, it is not an innocent decision to try to mix different approach. -- Cordialement, Aldrik
pgpg4181PlOsY.pgp
Description: PGP signature
_______________________________________________ Gnu-arch-users mailing list [email protected] http://lists.gnu.org/mailman/listinfo/gnu-arch-users GNU arch home page: http://savannah.gnu.org/projects/gnu-arch/
