On Tue, Jan 17, 2006 at 02:39:22AM +0100, Alfred M. Szmidt wrote: > > All of these are minor improvments, and nothing significant. For > > tla you had `tla-fork', and `tla-switch'. > > No you didn't, they were NOT part of tla. > > Not directly, but then, baz was never part of tla,
never said they were > so your point is > completely moot, irrelevant, and you are looking for a flame. This is so pot-calling-kettle stuff I think I've entered a disturbing new universe. > If I add a new option, or an alias for a old one, that is not a You've been told many times now that they were NOT a simple alias or option, and they DID make a significant subjective difference for many. Including me. > significant change. That is the only change baz did, add some aliases > or change the behaviour of a very small subset of options. Such > changes are not significant. I find it amazing that some people here > have such grave reading difficulties. Choke Go away silly person _______________________________________________ Gnu-arch-users mailing list Gnu-arch-users@gnu.org http://lists.gnu.org/mailman/listinfo/gnu-arch-users GNU arch home page: http://savannah.gnu.org/projects/gnu-arch/
