Make things simple---recommend GPL all the way. If the goal is to make things simple, lets use the modified BSD license. If the goal is to preserve freedom, we must evaluate everything. For software, the GPL makes sense, for documentation, the GFDL makes sense.
The rest of your message assumes that one will never make a printed hardcopy of the documentation, something that you cannot know, and it is more likley that if there is a good manual, then it will be printed. And even so, the GFDL is a very good choice for normal online documentation of all sorts, not only hardcopy manuals. _______________________________________________ Gnu-arch-users mailing list [email protected] http://lists.gnu.org/mailman/listinfo/gnu-arch-users GNU arch home page: http://savannah.gnu.org/projects/gnu-arch/
