Hi, Andy Tai <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
> tla my-revision-lirary => tla library-dir > > tla make-archive => tla archive-create Wait. The current naming is not as ``principled'' as the one proposed by Stefan, but it is *consistent*. If we were to switch to some other naming scheme, we'd have to do it for each and every command name in order to maintain consistency. So I think we should not pick up two command names at random and change their names while leaving the rest unchanged. ;-) As for the naming scheme, I find the current one quite nice in fact. Unlike Stefan's, it's not systematic, but it has the advantage of being human-readable and concise, which is a good thing for a CLI. Thanks, Ludovic. _______________________________________________ Gnu-arch-users mailing list Gnu-arch-users@gnu.org http://lists.gnu.org/mailman/listinfo/gnu-arch-users GNU arch home page: http://savannah.gnu.org/projects/gnu-arch/
