"Andy Tai" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes: > Hi, for the partial commit problem I am thinking of a simple method: > the user will have to commit the whole tree after a file renaming or > file deletion operation, which means the change to the directory > content. Are there any objection to this approach as a short-term > measure? Thanks for comments on this.
Wait a minute are you saying partial commits would be disallowed in the presence of "tree modification"? That seems way too harsh -- I _very_ often do partial commits of "only modified" files when I've added or removed other files.. I can more or less deal with the current constraints, but it would be very annoying if there were even more constraints... -miles -- "Suppose we've chosen the wrong god. Every time we go to church we're just making him madder and madder." -- Homer Simpson _______________________________________________ Gnu-arch-users mailing list [email protected] http://lists.gnu.org/mailman/listinfo/gnu-arch-users GNU arch home page: http://savannah.gnu.org/projects/gnu-arch/
