On Sun, Apr 23, 2006 at 02:54:48AM -0700, Andy Tai wrote: > James I don't think this is an issue here. Arch was of Tom's design and > Arch 2.0 is still Tom's design. So it is great that Tom is leading the > discussion and if Tom wants to push Arch 2.0 forward I am all for it. > > I have kept tla alive, but for major advancements Tom is the best person to > push for them and to lead the community to achieve them. (Yes, I still keep > tla alive. Tla is not going anywhere but won't see any big changes either)
I understand. Good luck to the gnuarch team. I bet you guys will do great. Whoever's supposed to be in charge of the website -- please email me directly (I'm no longer on the list) about moving http://gnuarch.org off of my machine. Regards, James > > On 4/23/06, James Blackwell <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > > > > > > Andy has done a very good job running GnuArch. He communicates well, is > > skilled at avoiding minefields on this list, is open to ideas from > > everyone on the group and seeks consensus. I nominate Andy Tai to stay in > > charge of GnuArch. > > > > > _______________________________________________ > Gnu-arch-users mailing list > Gnu-arch-users@gnu.org > http://lists.gnu.org/mailman/listinfo/gnu-arch-users > > GNU arch home page: > http://savannah.gnu.org/projects/gnu-arch/ -- My home page: <a href="http://jblack.linuxguru.net";>James Blackwell</a> Gnupg 06357400 F-print AAE4 8C76 58DA 5902 761D 247A 8A55 DA73 0635 7400
signature.asc
Description: Digital signature
_______________________________________________ Gnu-arch-users mailing list Gnu-arch-users@gnu.org http://lists.gnu.org/mailman/listinfo/gnu-arch-users GNU arch home page: http://savannah.gnu.org/projects/gnu-arch/
