Thomas Lord <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes: > And, in the news: yes, I do actually plan to start releasing > code for Arch 2.0, within some small number of days. There > won't be enough there, initially, to migrate to but, for what > it's worth, that's coming up and is probably relevant to the I.T. > questions.
So what sort of design did you end up with? My impression from before is that it was roughly going to be sort of a mix of a vaguely git-ish low-level with a more arch-ish user layer on top of it? [That would be cool ... I'm a big fan of git's basic design, and the fact that every operation is mind-blowingly fast is a rather nice change from arch (where everything is .... slow), but when I've tried to set it up to my own preferences, I could never quite get it to do the right thing... I think git is a great advance, but there's a lot that still needs to be worked out.] -Miles -- `Cars give people wonderful freedom and increase their opportunities. But they also destroy the environment, to an extent so drastic that they kill all social life' (from _A Pattern Language_) _______________________________________________ Gnu-arch-users mailing list Gnu-arch-users@gnu.org http://lists.gnu.org/mailman/listinfo/gnu-arch-users GNU arch home page: http://savannah.gnu.org/projects/gnu-arch/
