Andy Tai wrote:
I am willing to offer an award. Which will complete first, the Hurd kernel (the next major version) or Arch 2.0. Whatever finishes first, its author will get US$100 from me. Not much money, but a small amount that I can give...
:-). I dunno, man... you know, arguably, there have been Hurd releases that are already of at least a high a quality and with at least as much promise as the original Linux kernel. What do you mean by "finishes?" You might already owe someone $100 ... or, equally plausibly, might not ever owe either party such a sum :-)
-t
On 2/27/07, *Thomas Lord* < [EMAIL PROTECTED] <mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]>> wrote: Alfred M. Szmidt wrote: > Stop whining about the past, and finish arch 2.x. You promised if I > recall... > > "Promise" is *slightly to strong a term but, yes, I haven't stopped work on it. The message to which you reply was not, by any reasonable definition, "whining." -t _______________________________________________ Gnu-arch-users mailing list Gnu-arch-users@gnu.org <mailto:Gnu-arch-users@gnu.org> http://lists.gnu.org/mailman/listinfo/gnu-arch-users GNU arch home page: http://savannah.gnu.org/projects/gnu-arch/ -- Andy Tai, [EMAIL PROTECTED] <mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]> ------------------------------------------------------------------------ _______________________________________________ Gnu-arch-users mailing list Gnu-arch-users@gnu.org http://lists.gnu.org/mailman/listinfo/gnu-arch-users GNU arch home page: http://savannah.gnu.org/projects/gnu-arch/
_______________________________________________ Gnu-arch-users mailing list Gnu-arch-users@gnu.org http://lists.gnu.org/mailman/listinfo/gnu-arch-users GNU arch home page: http://savannah.gnu.org/projects/gnu-arch/
