> You still have {arch} for the whole tree, and .arch-ids for each
> sub-directory.
The .arch-ids are not indispensable.
That is true to the extent that one only has files that are plain
text, and no binary files. Seeing that the OP wanted to manage a
entire root file-system, he cannot get away without using meta-data
all over the place.
But now re-reading the OP's post, I'm wondering what he means with
meta-data, there are several types of meta-data. One is for book
keeping ({arch}, .arch-ids), and the other is history. Chris, could
you clarify what you mean?
_______________________________________________
Gnu-arch-users mailing list
Gnu-arch-users@gnu.org
http://lists.gnu.org/mailman/listinfo/gnu-arch-users
GNU arch home page:
http://savannah.gnu.org/projects/gnu-arch/
