Hi, Am Freitag, 5. Dezember 2008 schrieb Thomas Lord: > > Arch does better than git in taxonimizing versioned objects and in its > management of coding history, branching, merging, etc.... but Arch > shares with gittorrent this idea of distributed, decentralized revision > control -- free software source code should be just sort of "floating" > on a meta-net, on the Internet, over a P2P layer -- just so. This is a > political goal because of the "decentralization" part.
I tried something like that back in the days of "larch". http://www.unix-ag.uni-kl.de/~conrad/Archives/DSDiF/index.html Basically, the idea was to host larch archives within freenet. The proof-of-concept worked, but then tla was born, and somehow the project fell asleep... The only thing that's really needed for hosting arch archives in freenet is an efficient way to mirror local archives into freenet and vice versa. Bye, Peter -- Peter Conrad Tel: +49 6102 / 80 99 072 [ t]ivano Software GmbH Fax: +49 6102 / 80 99 071 Bahnhofstr. 18 http://www.tivano.de/ 63263 Neu-Isenburg Germany _______________________________________________ Gnu-arch-users mailing list Gnu-arch-users@gnu.org http://lists.gnu.org/mailman/listinfo/gnu-arch-users GNU arch home page: http://savannah.gnu.org/projects/gnu-arch/
