>>>>> "Drew" == Drew Adams <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
Leo> Another way of looking at it is that it will get more users to use the
>> newer versions of emacs and help with the development and testing. I see
>> no reason not to do that.
Drew> A specious argument, IMO. Most people who use Emacs 20 have little
Drew> choice; it is mandated in their place of work or they have no way to
Drew> install a later version on a captive machine.
So is it really true that we have no consensus about this question?
Forcing updates on users---who may not even be in a position to do so even if
they want---because of political instead of technical reasons?
Maybe one missing hour of sleep is making me aggressive but this sounds too Big
Bill at best and fascist at worst.
Toto
PS: In order to talk about linum.el again: Looks nice but makes scrolling nearly
impossible on my box...
--
Contact information and PGP key at
http://www-users.rwth-aachen.de/thorsten.bonow
Germany 0 : Orwell 1984
_______________________________________________
gnu-emacs-sources mailing list
[email protected]
http://lists.gnu.org/mailman/listinfo/gnu-emacs-sources
