>> Why not just
>> 
>> (let ((write-region-post-annotation-function nil))
>> ,@body)

> Looks a bit excessive, doesn't it.  It's meant act only on the badness
> in the current buffer, not all buffers.  Not that I'm expecting any
> writes from other buffers, perhaps except a temp buffer of my own, but
> just in case.  I probably should confine the fixup to when
> post-annotation is set to kill-buffer, just in case in the future
> there's a value there that's actually wanted.

Oh, you mean you did it for overengineering purposes?
OK, to each his own,


        Stefan


PS: How 'bout my proposed fix?


_______________________________________________
gnu-emacs-sources mailing list
[email protected]
http://lists.gnu.org/mailman/listinfo/gnu-emacs-sources

Reply via email to