On Saturday 12 December 2009 7:43:26 am A.J. Venter wrote: > On Fri, Dec 11, 2009 at 1:23 AM, Richard Stallman <[email protected]> wrote: > > The extension site doesn't give any > > indication of the license of any particular extension > > (https://chrome.google.com/extensions). So unless there is some sort > > of requirement by google that only free extensions go there, it's a > > possible problem for free distros. > > > > We might want to raise this issue with Google > > and ask them to post only free extensions. > > Worth a try - it would make it quite a bit easier there. Just to > answer the other question - yes it is directly referenced, on the > extensions management tool this page is linked as a source for getting > new extensions. > > On the plugin side, there is also a catch - I can find no way to make > chromium use gnash or libsfw - but it seems to be able to import adobe > flash from firefox if it's there... so we have a browser that seems to > only support the non-free flash plugin, I will > do some more checking though - I may just be missing the methodology. > > A.J. > adobe
With binary packages of Chromium, which are downloaded from http://build.chromium.org/buildbot/snapshots/chromium-rel-linux/, Gnash works fine. -- Omar Botta Co-director VENENUX GNU/Linux www.venenux.org
