On Wed, 23 Mar 2011 07:56:17 +0100 Daniel Olivera <[email protected]> wrote:
> El 23/03/11 03:36, Rubén Rodríguez escribió: > > The copyright file provided by google (the one linked at the LP > > blacklist) is ok, but the actual copyright file provided by Ubuntu > > is this humongous thing: > > http://changelogs.ubuntu.com/changelogs/pool/universe/c/chromium-browser/chromium-browser_10.0.648.133~r77742-0ubuntu0.10.10.1/copyright > > It includes things marked as Copyright: UNKNOWN: License: *No > > copyright* UNKNOWN > > > > That is problem only for ubuntu or debian. Only if the UNKNOWN files only exist in ubuntu and debian. > > The debian one (they have it in stable/main) is about the same. > > > >> ¿Could someone specify which so it can be removed/replaced for > >> Ututo? > > > > Use free code from source not debian or ubuntu packages. > Obviously for copied-ubuntu/debian-based distribution is a hard work > because the only one option is remove packages. Patching code isn't hard. rewriting chunks of a complex code base are. Unless you have a particular reason to think Debian/ubuntu have their analysis wrong (noting that its always a work in progress, these things dont stay static) could you expand on it? For what its worth, I just did some spot checks on files listed as UNKNOWN and some have been updated in the svn repo. Hopefully this continues :) > Best > > happy hacking!! and you! :) thanks, kk -- Karl Goetz, (Kamping_Kaiser / VK5FOSS) Debian contributor / gNewSense Maintainer http://www.kgoetz.id.au No, I won't join your social networking group
signature.asc
Description: PGP signature
