https://www.mozilla.org/foundation/trademarks/policy.html
========================================================================== If you're taking full advantage of the open-source nature of Mozilla's products and making significant functional changes, you may not redistribute the fruits of your labor under any Mozilla trademark, without Mozilla's prior written consent. For example, if the product you've modified is Firefox, you may not use Mozilla or Firefox, in whole or in part, in its name. Also, it would be inappropriate for you to say "based on Mozilla Firefox". Instead, in the interest of complete accuracy, you could describe your executables as "based on Mozilla technology", or "incorporating Mozilla source code." In addition, you may want to read the discussion on the "Powered by Mozilla" logo. In addition, if you compile a modified version, as discussed above, with branding enabled (the default in our source code is branding disabled), you will require Mozilla's prior written permission. If it's not the unmodified installer package from www.mozilla.com, and you want to use our trademark(s), our review and approval of your modifications is required. You also must change the name of the executable so as to reduce the chance that a user of the modified software will be misled into believing it to be a native Mozilla product. Again, any modification to the Mozilla product, including adding to, modifying in any way, or deleting content from the files included with an installer, file location changes, added code, modification of any source files including additions and deletions, etc., will require our permission if you want to use the Mozilla Marks. If you have any doubt, just ask us at [email protected]. ============================== so mozilla is not free software you can modify mozilla to get a "free software" but in that case the source is not free, becouse you will have a "non source", source as in linux, the very source is not free, so what is free is not the source, but a modified software that you cannot call source, if you speak by the truth. as in linux, as in debian, or in other mix software, or derivatives, we do not really have free source we need new, independient projects, a new free kernel, a new free browser, with free true sources, and a comunity involved in free software principles. 2011/7/21 Jason Self <[email protected]>: > Rubén Rodríguez wrote: >> * Does it render the program non-free? > > Sam Geeraerts <[email protected]> wrote .. >> I think so. If you put Firefox with branding on a Trisquel CD then you >> (or anyone else) can't sell that CD, as I understand it. > > That seems to be exactly what it's saying: > "If you want to distribute the unchanged official binaries using the Mozilla > Marks, you may do so, without receiving any further permission from Mozilla, > as > long as you comply with this Trademark Policy and you distribute them without > charge." > > Not being able to charge money for unmodified binaries does seem to conflict > with that with what the FSF has in their Free Software Definition. > -- Diego Saravia [email protected] NO FUNCIONA->[email protected] ==================================================================== "Disclaimer:" Haré lo que desee con los correos que reciba, quien no este de acuerdo, que se abstenga de enviarme correo a mí o a las listas donde este suscripto. En particular NO VALE ningun "disclaimer" que indique que el correo enviado es privado o sujeto a normas de empresas, gobiernos, u organizaciones de cualquier tipo. Con relación a los estados y sus leyes, analizare cualquier norma aplicable en el territorio donde eventualmente actúe en el momento, escucho a cualquiera que tenga algo que decir. Con respecto en particular a los derechos de autor, salvo acuerdo previo, gozaré plenamente de las 4 libertades con todo lo que reciba, considerandolo, en cuanto a lo patrimonial, como propio. ====================================================================
