On Fri, 23 Mar 2012 18:28:53 +0100 Jaromil <[email protected]> wrote: > > re all, > > from a recent exchange with Jason about ads appearing on > dynebolic.org and dyne.org pages, here comes an issue that we both > think is worth and important to debate here: ads, indeed.
Adverts suck :( I can see why they are a help though. If our hosting came out of my/our pocket we'd have to do things very differently. > long story short, three proposals: > > does someone has in mind to retry do something like AdBard? The website doesn't give much information (and I found very little with duckduckgo). Can someone give a quick explanation of why it failed? > if not, should we try to share such a domain blacklist for our sites? What would the blacklist contain? Sites which shouldn't be linked to by the adverts? > or can we try to lobby with Google to add a category to the ad > program that says "proprietary software" just like they do already > for nudity, gambling and other controversial categories? tbh, proprietary software *isn't* controversial - free software is :P > I'm not really a big fan of commercials, but well there is nothing > else that looks like generating an income out of Internet popularity > and attention right now, at least until we get Bitcoin to a better > shape... :^) You should have started mining sooner! thanks, kk -- Karl Goetz, (Kamping_Kaiser / VK7FOSS) http://www.kgoetz.id.au No, I won't join your social networking group *** I've changed GPG key to 6C097260 ***
signature.asc
Description: PGP signature
